Film production and distribution is dominated by the top Hollywood
film institutions. These institutions are known as the Big 6 and they comprise
of Disney, Paramount, Warner Brothers, 20th century Fox, Columbia and
Universal Studios. These big six are huge conglomerates which have control of
most of the film industry and benefit from making High budget, commercially and
most of the time critically successful films. In this essay I am going to
discuss how film is produced and distributed to audiences and debate how they
differ depending on the institution and the film.
To start off, High budgeted films such as Frozen (2013) and
The Hunger Games (2012) tend to be filmed and produced mainly in a studio
setting opposed to location. For Frozen, it is the 53rd animated
Disney film meaning that it was only produced in a studio with zero filming on
location. Animation uses a large amount of expensive and time consuming
software which a company outside the big 6 would not be able to afford nor have
the knowledge how to use. Furthermore, The Hunger Games was filmed mostly on a
set/ in a studio since a large amount of the film utilises CGI (computer
generated images) that is only really available to and used by large film
conglomerates like the big six or movies that are highly budgeted. This allows films to be more high quality and
thus more impressive which is highly attractive to any audience. Some film
institutions are vertically and horizontally integrated like Disney and are
able to produce, exhibit, distribute and market their films all in house. Frozen
for example was filmed in Walt Disney studios and then distributed to all of it
cinemas and was then sold in Disney stores and could be viewed on the Disney website.
This is a huge positive for huge conglomerates as it means that they are able
to do everything independently which allows them to keep rights and keep everything
internalised. In continuation, huge film conglomerates had always filmed on
rolls of film, however this is expensive and time consuming to duplicate during
the distribution process. This has lead to digital filming and distribution in
recent years which has changed the way in which cinemas showcase films. On the
other hand, this is an issue for distributors since film can be much more
easily duplicated fraudulently when they are distributed digitally as this is
usually done via a large memory stick almost. If criminals get hold of this it
could damage the film industry and increase the amount of online film piracy.
On the flip side, low budget movies are usually unable to produce
AND distribute their films. For instance, take Bridget Jones’s Baby (2016)
which was a low budget film ($35M) produced by Working Title. The film was part
of a US-UK collaboration between Working Title and Universal Studios which lead
to the film becoming a commercially and critically successful film across
Europe and the USA with the highest concentration of success being in the
United Kingdom. Without this collaboration the film would never have been so successful.
This is because Universal is a huge film conglomerate and part of the Big 6 and
Working Title a medium sized British production company. Without investment
form the US, Bridget Jones’s Baby would never have been possible. The issues
would have arisen with the distribution. Whilst it had been produced well by
the independent production company Working Title, it would not have been
distributed effectively since Working Title like many other independent companies
simply does not have the range nor capability which Universal does and thus it
would never have become a success in countries like the USA or across Europe. Furthermore,
the ‘Americanisation’ of the film also contributed to the success in
production. The way it was produced was very American in that it looked like a
high budget film when in reality it was not and also the fact that it had the
American star appeal in the very popular actress Renee Zellweger. Overall, film
distribution and production is a challenge for independent institutions and low
budget film producers since the money is simply not there to make it a huge success
and to spread it to the right audience.
Overall, film production and distribution will always be
dominated by the big 6 because they are a force which cannot be reckoned with. From
production through to the distribution they are far superior to an other film
institutions across the globe which in turn just makes it harder for lower
budget independent films to get recognition since they simply do not have the
budget for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment